Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +4360%
12 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

640MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
22
112
Shading Units
2816
28
TMUs
88
20
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
AD107
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net