NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 13W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
+3885%
0.797 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
3
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GP108B
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
