NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 30W)
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
+1820%
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
13W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
RV730
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
