Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs ATI FirePro V7750

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs ATI FirePro V7750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 76W)
ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
FirePro V7750 +1665%
0.512 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
512.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
76W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 GL XTX
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy