Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 9400M G and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 23W)
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400M G
0.035 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition +160%
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 9M IGP
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

2
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

C79
GPU Name
C89
MCP79MXT-B3
GPU Variant
MCP89
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
-
Foundry
-
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy