Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +14015%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
156.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Navi 21
G94-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy