NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs AMD FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (84W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
+1820%
5.069 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
384MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
26.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
264.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
84W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
