Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1155MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q +7292%
5.914 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2008
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 9M
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
40
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.92 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.83 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.914 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
TU104
NB9P-GS1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy