Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265 +691%
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2008
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 9M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Opal
NB9P-GS1-A2
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy