CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
88 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
0.448 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
+19%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 9
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
27
128
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
46.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
171W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GT200B
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCI
2
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
3
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD FirePro S9000
4
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD Radeon R9 370 1024SP
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
8
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
9
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs ATI Radeon X550 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy