Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +2673%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Lexa
GT218-200-B1
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy