Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 GK107 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 1030 GK107
0.812 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +250%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2018
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.464 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
33.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
812.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
33.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy