Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
4432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +8670%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
GeForce 100
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.02GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
70
48
Shading Units
4480
24
TMUs
280
12
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
14.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94B
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy