Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
FirePro W600 +269%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 100
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94B
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy