CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+157%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 100
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
105W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy