NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock1725MHz

More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)

1184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GT 230 OEM

0.24 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1740%

4.416 TFLOPS

GeForce GT 230 OEM

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Graphics Card

Apr 2009

Release Date

Nov 2019

GeForce 200

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1530 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1725 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

1536MB

Memory Size

4GB

DDR2

Memory Type

GDDR6

192bit

Memory Bus

128bit

24.00GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

12

SM Count

20

-

Compute Units

-

96

Shading Units

1280

48

TMUs

80

12

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

48 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.20 GPixel/s

24.00 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

138.0 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

8.832 TFLOPS

240.0 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.416 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92B

GPU Name

TU116

G92-159-B1

GPU Variant

TU116-250-KA-A1

Tesla

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

12 nm

0.754 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

260 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

100W

250 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

1.1

CUDA

7.5

4.0

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM

3

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

4

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

5

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6970 X2

6

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

7

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X

8

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

9

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

10

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

2

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

3

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

4

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

5

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

6

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

7

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

8

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

9

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

10

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W