Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs AMD FirePro M2000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 33W)
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240M
0.116 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000 +313%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 200M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
48
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Turks
N10P-GS
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

23W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy