Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (27.20GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM +79%
0.257 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

69W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV630
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy