Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 8950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 8950 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8950 OEM +1189%
3.315 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jan 2013
GeForce 300
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.315 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
828.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy