Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900 +486%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Turks
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy