Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8800

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800 +1915%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1600
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
208W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Cypress
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy