Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +867%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy