Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +816%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
RV770
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy