Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (32W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +309%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
27
48
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GT200
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy