Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +8106%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Aug 2018
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Vega 10
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy