Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +515%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Oland
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy