Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +2411%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Tonga
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy