Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 435M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 435M
0.227 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +5340%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 400M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
96
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.360 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
9.440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
226.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
18.88 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
AD107
N11E-GE-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy