Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +1726%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 500
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
14
48
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
TU116
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy