Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 75W)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 625 OEM
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900 +357%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
825 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
13.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.748 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
6.992 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
167.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
13.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

29W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy