Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (29W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 625 OEM
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +654%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
825 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
13.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.748 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
6.992 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
167.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
13.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy