Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +29%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
27
144
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
17.28 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
34.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
GT200
GF116-150-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy