Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +29%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
27
144
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
17.28 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
34.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
GT200B
GF116-150-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy