Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +129%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
3
SM Count
-
144
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
17.28 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
34.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GF116-150-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy