Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (102W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +274%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
957 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
288
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.312 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
37.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
894.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
74.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

102W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy