Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (102W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +358%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
957 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
6
SM Count
-
288
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.312 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
37.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
894.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
74.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

102W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy