Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (102W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +816%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
957 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
6
SM Count
-
288
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.312 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
37.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
894.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
74.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

102W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy