Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 102W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +418%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 600
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
957 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
6
SM Count
-
288
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.312 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
37.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
894.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
74.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

102W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy