Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 102W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1242%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
957 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
22
288
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.312 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
37.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
894.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
74.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

102W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy