Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs Intel Arc Pro A60M

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs Intel Arc Pro A60M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M +2673%
5.325 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 100M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
DG2-256
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
Unknown
240 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy