Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM +100%
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 100M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
RV730
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy