Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +2269%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
275W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Fiji
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy