NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+455%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1440
56
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Cypress
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
