Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100 +66%
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy