Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
88 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +38%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
27
128
Shading Units
216
64
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
GT200
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy