Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +2122%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
128
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Fiji
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy