CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
NVIDIA RTX A1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1462MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
RTX A1000
+1640%
6.737 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
VS
RTX A1000
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
727 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
18
128
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
GA107
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6990
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 570 X2
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro V5900
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon X1550
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro W7000
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs Intel Arc Pro A50
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy