Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro W7000

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +528%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
128
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy