Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +654%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
3
SM Count
-
144
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy