Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +3851%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
3
SM Count
-
144
Shading Units
3840
24
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy